<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Indie Classics: Pulp Fiction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eckerd.edu/sundance/2009/01/12/pulp-fiction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eckerd.edu/sundance/2009/01/12/pulp-fiction/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 08:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Andersen</title>
		<link>http://www.eckerd.edu/sundance/2009/01/12/pulp-fiction/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Andersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eckerd.edu/sundance/?p=567#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Nicely done!  (It should be said, though, that $9 million is a very small budget for a film this big -- and it was Harvey Weinstein, et al who laid down the cash on the promise of Tarantino's exceptional debut feature Reservoir Dogs).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicely done!  (It should be said, though, that $9 million is a very small budget for a film this big &#8212; and it was Harvey Weinstein, et al who laid down the cash on the promise of Tarantino&#8217;s exceptional debut feature Reservoir Dogs).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

