<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Awful Break</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eckerd.edu/sundance/2009/01/24/an-awful-break/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eckerd.edu/sundance/2009/01/24/an-awful-break/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 00:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Andersen</title>
		<link>http://www.eckerd.edu/sundance/2009/01/24/an-awful-break/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Andersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 01:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eckerd.edu/sundance/?p=1730#comment-44</guid>
		<description>I didn't catch this, but the idea of capturing an ordinary scene at length or in slow motion is not new.  Warhol's "Empire" is a continuous 12 hour image of the Empire State Building; his "Sleep" is something like 8 hours of Warhol's naked lover sleeping.  A few years ago, there was a film here called something like "Pine Flats" that consisted of 8 ten minute sequences with an unchanging camera angle and not much happening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t catch this, but the idea of capturing an ordinary scene at length or in slow motion is not new.  Warhol&#8217;s &#8220;Empire&#8221; is a continuous 12 hour image of the Empire State Building; his &#8220;Sleep&#8221; is something like 8 hours of Warhol&#8217;s naked lover sleeping.  A few years ago, there was a film here called something like &#8220;Pine Flats&#8221; that consisted of 8 ten minute sequences with an unchanging camera angle and not much happening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
